Month: June 2016

Can We Finally Be Rid of This Treasonous Moron?

June 14, 2016

So a man with no balls gets some criticism from a man who has them aplenty, and, of course, the response is to be the petty, thin-skinned, and ineffectual empty suit that he’s been for the last eight years.  President Obama did today what he does best—vented against Donald Trump for telling the truth–and put on full display what a feckless and dangerous president he is.

Trump finally got under his and Hillary’s skin and forced them both to capitulate and utter the OH MY GOSH dreaded words “Islamic Terrorism.”  Hey, Barack HUSSEIN, if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it probably is a duck!!  Obama’s intractable refusal to use the phrase “Islamic Terrorism” is a window to his utterly clueless soul where the Ft. Hood massacre is deemed workplace violence and the recent shootings in Orlando are considered an attack on the LGBT community (pardon me if I missed a letter in the ever-expanding whiner community which considers everyone but white, hard-working male Americans to be a protected class in need of safe spaces) even as the shooter professed his support for ISIS throughout the massacre.  (Obama, of course, calls the enemy ISIL in another demonstration of his self-perceived erudition—ten will get you twenty he has no idea what the L stands for, he just knows that if the mass of Americans say ISIS, he’ll say ISIL.)

With today’s petulant outburst, Barack HUSSEIN has removed all doubt about who our next President should be, and trust me, it shouldn’t be wearing a Mao pantsuit and touting a vagina as its only selling point.  God forbid a continuation of the policies which have mired this country in the toilet bowl eddy from which I fear there is no escape.

 

Barack HUSSEIN posed a number of questions and made several pronouncements that I’ll address one by one.

 

  • In speaking of the words “Islamic Terrorism” Obama asked, “What exactly would using this label accomplish?”

Well, it would let your constituents know that you have the ability to connect some dots and that you want to start targeting the people responsible for the bloodshed instead of denigrating gun-owning Americans who simply want to protect themselves from the trash that you’re importing on a daily basis under the guise of compassion.  If someone asks me to jump into a pool of fish, I’d think it fairly important to know if those fish are sharks or guppies.  You can’t attack an enemy if you don’t sharpen your focus and aim at it.  It is not Jews committing these daily slaughters across the globe…it is not Christians and it’s not Buddhists, Hindus, or Taoists.  It’s Muslims!

 

  • “Since before I was president I’ve been clear about how extremist groups have perverted Islam to justify terrorism,” the sympathizer said.

Well the time has come to explore if there is a difference between “extremist” Muslims and “mainstream” Muslims.  This is a religion that marginalizes and kills gays, women, Jews, Christians, and infidels yet we’re supposed to be tolerant of them.  There are TEN Muslim countries where the penalty for homosexuality is death including Saudi Arabia where you famously groveled and bowed to King Abdullah during a trip on April 1, 2009 (I mention the date as it’s not lost on me that it was April Fool’s Day!).  Are we to infer that these ten countries aren’t mainstream?  That they are extremist?  Then maybe we shouldn’t be doing business with them and lifting their sanctions.  But you get after Hobby Lobby and Chick-fil-A, Mr. Prez.

 

  • Obama went on to say, “Not once has an advisor of mine said, ‘Man, if we use that phrase, we’re going to turn this whole thing around.’”

That’s because your advisors, including the Iranian born Valerie Jarrett, are as dim as you are and proudly belong to the agenda driven “Hate America First” crowd that you’ve consorted with your entire life.

 

  • “Does someone seriously think we don’t know who we’re fighting?”

Well apparently not since you keep denying the obvious and continue to embrace Syrian refugees and other unvetted immigrants that are at best a financial burden, and at worst, killers waiting to happen.  The FBI was suspicious of, and had two separate contacts with, the Orlando murderer, but political correctness prevented them from taking action to head off the carnage.  This was also the case with the San Bernardino killer whom neighbors accused of being suspicious, but who didn’t speak out lest they be called bigoted.  You, Barack HUSSEIN, have engendered a climate where people are more fearful of being called racists than identifying and eliminating the murderers in our midst.

 

  • Obama doubled down on his naivete (or outright hostility to the country—I honestly can’t tell anymore) by declaring that the Orlando, San Bernardino, and Ft. Hood killers were all American citizens.

This is classic political obfuscation of which he is the grand master.  They were,    indeed, citizens, but they shouldn’t have been—that’s the point.  All three killers   were second-generation citizens whose parents came to the United States from Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the West Bank, respectively.  Do you see a commonality there, Barack HUSSEIN????  As Trump has suggested we need to start wising up and looking out for ourselves.  There are certain regions of the world whose people don’t like us, and whom we don’t need.  Look at Molenbeek, Paris, Cologne, and even Dearborn, Michigan.  Muslims who refuse to assimilate have taken over and they grow bolder by the day.  They’re not afraid to denounce Western values loudly and brazenly even in their new countries, but we need to walk on eggshells to make sure we don’t offend them.

Alas, our spineless president’s most recent hissy fit can’t even be attributed to a heartfelt or sincere motive since he has no convictions or moral center other than his personal left-wing agenda.  The political undertones were manifested by a gratuitous swipe at Donald Trump whom he derisively mocked for tweeting and appearing on cable news shows.  If it weren’t so dangerous it would be hilarious that this wannabe rock star of a president condemns someone else for appearing on television.  At least Trump has the courage to go to various media outlets and hostile territory to answer questions which are invariably meant to make him look bad, while Obama busies himself slow-jamming the news with Jimmy Fallon and patting himself on the back with his fawning liberal sycophants in Hollywood.

 

Finally the empty suit reveals the true enemy, the only enemy he has the fortitude to take on.  “Do Republican officials actually agree with this?” he asks in reference to the use of the words “Islamic Terrorism.”  No they don’t, Barack HUSSEIN, that’s why they were decimated in the primaries, steamrolled by a Donald Trump who received more votes than any Republican nominee in history.  He actually wants to put America and Americans first.  What a refreshing concept for a President!

Facts Out the Window When it Comes to Assaulting Trump

June 7, 2016

 

 

So here we are again—the entire corrupt and in-the-tank media, abetted by the lifelong feeding at the trough political establishment, is taking Donald Trump’s truths and using political correctness to try and portray them as falsehoods.

Trump is in hot water again for telling the truth, and we all know such a thing is no longer tolerated in a country besotted with political correctness, safe spaces, open borders, and fawning over illegals and other sundry thugs that would shout down anyone who disagrees with them.  The issue this time is Trump’s insistence that he cannot get a fair trial in his Trump University lawsuit because the sitting judge, Gonzalo Curiel, is of Mexican heritage.  All the America-haters, which include the current scum running our government in both parties, from the Paul Ryans to the Mitch McConnells to the Nancy Pelosis—concerned only with maintaining the status quo whereby they can loot and steal from the hard-working people—have denounced Trump as…wait for it…a RACIST!!!

Aside from the utterly unoriginal accusation—anyone to the right of Che Guevara is now denounced as racist—the charges are utterly baseless.

Let’s look at the facts:

1)  Curiel was born to Mexican parents

2)  He is a member of the La Raza Lawyers of San Diego which is a subset of the   La Raza Lawyers of California

3)  The La Raza group is and has been for years strongly engaged in the support of, and amnesty for, illegal Mexicans living in the USA

4)  Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, the law firm representing the plaintiffs in the class-action suit, has given Crooked Hillary and her rapist husband $675,000 in speaking fees since 2009

5)  Donald Trump has made illegal immigration his top priority as the Republican nominee, and has vowed to build a wall to stem the influx of illegal Mexicans.

So tell me why it is so improbable that Curiel might have some prejudice toward Trump and not be able to render an impartial and fair verdict.  One is always able to tell who the liar is by how much they have to twist the facts to suit their positions.  In this case, Trump has stated facts, and his foaming at the mouth opposition is in full spin mode trying to give Curiel a pass for his associations, which in and of themselves, could be deemed racist.

La Raza translates as “The Race,” and thus the name itself implies separation and the  desire of its members to disassociate from the very people whose country they have invaded.  All the Hillary acolytes and the ever-lying media are now busying themselves trying to say Curiel’s group has no link to the national La Raza movement, which is named the National Council of La Raza.  A few minutes of basic homework will easily dispel this lie.  If you go on the La Raza Lawyers webpage, you can find a link to the National Council of La Raza!!  But, of course, to hear the Trump haters tell it, there is no connection!  Additionally, the La Raza Lawyers website states, “The purpose and goal of this Association is to promote the interests of the Latino communities throughout the state and the professional interests of the membership.”

The group in recent years has, among other things, given scholarships to illegals, seen their former president co-chair Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, and started riots at recent Trump rallies.  Imagine the hue and cry if a white judge were to belong to the White Lawyers of San Diego—there is no doubt the left would be screaming for blood and impugning the man’s ability to render a fair decision on any cases involving minorities.  Curiel’s heritage, by itself, has nothing at all to do with the current kerfuffle, but judges must maintain the appearance of impartiality, and belonging to a supremacist group that promotes one race over all others does not satisfy this mandate.

Are we not going to admit that this narrow interest of La Raza is in direct contravention of that which Trump is campaigning on?  Why then is it such a stretch that Trump would want Curiel to recuse himself from the case?  Why is it such a stretch that Curiel would make an unfavorable ruling for Trump based simply on personal feelings?

Indeed, let’s go back to the words of current Supreme Court justice Sonia Sotomayor to understand the Us vs. Them mentality of most minorities.  “Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences,” Sotomayor said during a speech at UC Berkeley in 2001, “our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging.”  She further went on to say, “I wonder whether by ignoring our differences as women or men of color we do a disservice both to the law and society.”  Sounds like judicial activism to me, and if she is capable of it, why wouldn’t Curiel be?

If recent years have shown us anything, it’s that courts, all the way up to the highest in the land, are merely political figureheads now.  From the absurd rulings and total disregard for the written word in the Affordable Care Act decisions to the outright crafting of law concerning same-sex marriage, courts are not to be trusted any longer.  They are peopled by human beings, susceptible to all manner of prejudice and bribery.

This is not to say that Curiel is dishonest or would make a prejudicial ruling, but to call Trump a racist for bringing the issue up is nothing more than political chicanery and deflection at its finest.